Arbitration is a legal technique for the resolution of disputes outside the courts, wherein the parties to a dispute refer it  construction arbitration law Philippinesto one or more persons (the "arbitrators", "arbiters" arbitration Philippines



  ( NOT free )

 Philippine Lawyers (Attorneys) for Legal Advice and -Services

  • construction arbitration and real estate (land titling etc.)

  • immigration (visa), dual citizenship

  • annulment (divorce, marriage)

  • labor law

  • adoption

  • maritime, environmental, mining, patent and trademark etc.

Philippine construction




construction arbitration law Philippines

 or "arbitral tribunal"), by whose decision (the "award") they agree to be bound. Arbitration in the United States and in other countries often includes alternative dispute resolution (ADR), a category that more commonly refers to mediation (a form of settlement negotiation facilitated by a neutral third party). It is more helpful, however, simply to
arbitration lawyer Philippines
arbitration lawyer Philippines classify arbitration as a form of binding dispute resolution, equivalent to litigation in the courts, and entirely distinct from the various forms of non-binding dispute resolution, such as negotiation, mediation, or non-binding determinations by experts arbitration attorney Philippines arbitration attorney Philippines .

Arbitration is, today, most commonly used for the resolution of commercial disputes, particularly in the context of international commercial transactions and sometimes used to enforce credit obligations. It is also used in some countries to resolve other types of disputes, such as labour disputes, consumer disputes or family disputes, and for the resolution of certain disputes between states and between investors
Philippine construction arbitration law  mining arbitration Philippines  and states.

Philippine construction arbitration law

[edit] History
It is not known exactly when formal non-judicial arbitration of disputes first began but it can be said with some certainty that arbitration, as a way of resolving disputes predates formal courts. Records from ancient Egypt attest to its use especially with high priests and their interaction with the public. Arbitration was popular both in ancient Greece and in Rome.[1][2]

Under English law 
Philippine arbitration lawyer , the first law on arbitration was the Arbitration Act 1697,[3] but when it was passed arbitration was already common. The first recorded judicial decision relating to arbitration was in England in 1610.[4] The noted Elizabethan English legal scholar Sir Edward Coke refers to an earlier decision dating from the reign of Edward IV (which ended in 1483). Early arbitrations at common law suffered from the fatal weakness that either party to the dispute could withdraw the arbitrator's mandate right up until the delivery of the award if things appeared to be going against them (this was rectified in the 1697 Act).

Philippine arbitration attorney

The growth of international trade however, brought greater sophistication to a process that had previously been largely ad hoc in relation to disputes between merchants resolved under the auspices of the lex mercatoria. As trade grew, so did the practice of arbitration, eventually leading to the creation of a variant now known as international arbitration, as a means for resolving disputes under international commercial contracts.

Today, arbitration also occurs online, in what is commonly referred to as Online Dispute Resolution, or ODR. Typically, ODR proceedings occur following the filing of a claim online, with the proceedings taking place over the internet, and judgment rendered on the basis of documentation presented. is the world's leader in Internet Arbitration.

Procedures which necessarily lead to a determination which the parties to the dispute may not enter into an agreement upon:[7] Some court procedures lead to judgments which bind all members of the general public, or public authorities in their capacity as such, or third parties, or which are being conducted in the public interest. Examples: Until relatively recently (80s), antitrust matters were not arbitrable in the United States.[8] Matters relating to crimes
Philippine arbitration lawyer, status and family law are generally not considered to be arbitrable, as the power of the parties to enter into an agreement upon these matters is at least restricted. However, most other disputes that involve private rights between two parties can be resolved using arbitration. In some disputes, parts of claims may be arbitrable and other parts not. For example, in a dispute over  Philippine arbitration attorney patent infringement, a determination of whether a patent has been infringed could be adjudicated upon by an arbitration tribunal, but the validity of a patent could not: As patents are subject to a system of public registration, an arbitral panel would have no power to order the relevant body to rectify any patent registration based upon its determination.
Some legal orders exclude or restrict the possibility of arbitration for reasons of the protection of weaker members of the public, e.g. consumers. Examples: German law excludes disputes over the rental of living space from any form of arbitration[9], while arbitration agreements with consumers are only considered valid if they are signed by either party,[10] and if the signed document does not bear any other content than the arbitration agreement.[11]

Manila, Cebu, Davao, Cavite, Laguna, Batangas, Tagaytay, Isabela, Tuguegarao, Laoag, Ilocos, Baguio, La Union, Pangasinan, Pampanga, Angeles, Zambales, Subic, Olongapo, Tarlac, Nueva Ecija, Bulacan, Malolos, Rizal, Antipolo, Metro Manila, Makati, Imus, Quezon, BICOL, Samar, Albay, Legaspi, Iloilo, Boracay, Negros, Dumaguete, Bacolod, Camotes Island, Leyte, Tacloban, Ormoc, Maasin, Bohol, Tagbilaran, Panglao, Iligan City, Cagayan de Oro, General Santos, Cotabato, Zamboanga, Davao, Samal, Tagum, Butuan, Palawan, Agusan, Surigao etc.