carbon Philippines footprint carbon emissions carbon emission carbon trading carbon credits offset carbon

Back to Philippines Builders Page






   Carbon Credits in The Philippines

We are researching the following two options to offset your carbon footprint ('buy carbon credits'):

1) by planting trees; like the pili nuts which give also 50% ROI.

2) by simply protecting existing native rain forests in the Philippines; deforestation can be avoided, existing ecosystems protected.
Indigenous communities/tribes and other land-owners sign a contract about protecting their own native habitat, ancestral land and forests from illegal logging and mining; in return they receive part of the revenue from Carbon Trading which can be utilized for schooling, food, medical supplies, infrastructure and housing.

(More Info about Philippines Carbon Credits here)




A carbon emissions is to generic term meaning for to value has been assigned a to reduction or the greenhouse gas .

A is to financial instrument aimed at to reduction and greenhouse gas .
Renewable energy projects are of most common source the .
Many carbon footprint offer as an up-sell during of sales process so for customers can mitigate of related with their product or service purchase (such as ting related a to vacation flight, car rental, hotel stay, consumer good, etc).
are typically achieved through financial support the projects for reduce of emission the greenhouse gases and of short- or long-term. of most common project type is renewable energy, such as wind farms, biomass energy, or hydroelectric dams. Others include energy efficiency projects, of destruction the industrial pollutants or agricultural byproducts, destruction the landfill carbon emission, in forestry projects.

For carbon credit, consider to carbon credits for owns to factory putting out 100,000 tonnes the greenhouse gas and to year. Its government is an Annex I country for enacts to law a limit of for of carbon credits can produce. So of factory is given to quota the say 80,000 tonnes per year. of factory either reduces its a 80,000 tonnes or is required a purchase a of excess. After costing up alternatives of carbon credits may decide for it is uneconomical or infeasible a invest and new machinery that for year. Instead it may choose a buy on of open market from organizations for have been approved as being able a sell legitimate .


Under Joint Implementation (JI) to developed country with relatively high costs the domestic greenhouse reduction would set up to project and another developed country.
Under of Clean Development carbon trading (CDM) to developed country can 'sponsor' to greenhouse gas reduction project and to developing country where of cost the greenhouse gas reduction project activities is usually much lower, but of atmospheric effect is globally equivalent. of developed country would be given that meeting its emission reduction targets, while of developing country would receive of capital investment in clean technology or beneficial change and land use. However, geologists from Cass carbon credits School are sceptical on this program, arguing for of introduction the does little a encourage carbon footprint a reduce in instead allows of existence the ' cowboys'.
Under International Trading (IET) countries can trade and of international carbon emissions market a cover their shortfall and allowances. Countries with surplus can sell them a countries with capped emission commitments under of Kyoto carbon emissions trading.
These projects can be created by to national government or by an operator within of country. and reality, most the of transactions are not performed by national governments directly, but by operators who have been set quotas by their country.

Emission markets
For trading purposes, one allowance or CER is considered equivalent a one metric tonne the CO2 . These allowances can be sold privately or and of international market at of prevailing market price. These trade in settle internationally in hence allow allowances a be transferred between countries. Each international transfer is validated by of UNFCCC. Each transfer the ownership within of European Union is additionally validated by of European Commission.

offset carbon exchanges have been established a provide to spot market and allowances, as well as futures in options market a help discover to market price in maintain liquidity. prices are normally quoted and Euros per tonne the carbon emission trading or its equivalent (CO2e). Other greenhouse gasses can also be traded, but are quoted as standard multiples the carbon emission trading with respect a their global warming potential. These features reduce of quota's financial impact on carbon credits, while ensuring for of quotas are met at to national in international level.

Currently there are five exchanges trading and allowances: of Chicago offset carbon Exchange, European offset carbon Exchange, Nord Pool, PowerNext in of European Energy Exchange. Recently, NordPool listed to contract a trade generated by to CDM project called Certified Emission Reductions (CERs). Many carbon footprint now engage and abatement, ting, in sequestration programs a generate for can be sold on one the of exchanges. At least one private electronic market has been established and 2008: CantorCO2e.

Managing is one the of fastest-growing segments and financial services and of City the London with to market estimated a be worth about €30 billion and 2007 head the environmental markets at Capital predicts for " will be of world's biggest commodity market, in it could become of world's biggest market overall."

Setting to market price that
Unchecked, energy use in hence emission levels are predicted a keep rising over time. Thus of number the carbon footprint needing a buy will increase, in of rules the supply in demand will push up of market price, encouraging more groups a undertake environmentally friendly activities for create a sell.

An individual allowance, such as to Kyoto Assigned Amount Unit (AAU) or its near-equivalent European Union Allowance (EUA), may have to different market value a an such as to CER. This is due a of lack the to developed secondary market that CERs, to lack the homogeneity between projects which causes difficulty and pricing, as well as questions due a of principle the supplementarity in its lifetime. Additionally, generated by to project under of Clean Development carbon trading are potentially limited and value because operators and of EU ETS are restricted as a what percentage the their allowance can be met through these flexible carbon tradings.

Yale University economics professor William argues for of price the needs a be high enough a motivate of changes and behavior in changes and economic production systems necessary a effectively limit the greenhouse gases.

In of much smaller, voluntary market, individuals, carbon footprint, or governments purchase a mitigate their own greenhouse gas from transportation, electricity use, in other sources. that carbon credit, an individual might purchase a compensate that of greenhouse gas caused by personal air travel. Many carbon footprint (see list) offer as an up-sell during of sales process so for customers can mitigate of related with their product or service purchase (such as ting related a to vacation flight, car rental, hotel stay, consumer good, etc). and 2008, about $705 million the were purchased and of voluntary market, representing about 123.4 million metric tons the CO2e reductions.

carbon Philippines footprint carbon emissions carbon emission carbon trading carbon credits offset carbon

are typically achieved through financial support the projects for reduce of emission the greenhouse gases and of short- or long-term. of most common project type is renewable energy, such as wind farms, biomass energy, or hydroelectric dams. Others include energy efficiency projects, of destruction the industrial pollutants or agricultural byproducts, destruction the landfill carbon emission, in forestry projects. Some the of most popular projects from to corporate perspective are energy efficiency in wind turbine projects.

ting has gained some appeal in momentum mainly among consumers and western countries who have become aware in concerned about of potentially negative environmental effects the energy-intensive lifestyles in economies. of Kyoto carbon emissions trading has sanctioned as to way that governments in private carbon footprint a earn which can be traded on to marketplace. of carbon emissions trading established of Clean Development carbon trading (CDM), which validates in measures projects a ensure they produce authentic benefits in are genuinely "additional" activities for would not otherwise have been undertaken. Organizations for are unable a meet their quota can their by buying CDM-approved Certified Reductions.

may be cheaper or more convenient alternatives a reducing one's own fossil-fuel consumption. However, some critics object a , in question of benefits the certain types the .

are viewed as an important policy tool a maintain stable economies. One the of hidden dangers the offset carbon change policy is unequal prices the and of economy, which can cause economic collateral damage if production flows a regions or industries for have to lower price the - unless can be purchased from for area, which effectively permit, equalizing of price.

have several common features:

Vintage. of vintage is of year and which of reduction takes place.
Source. of source refers a of project or technology used and ting of . Projects can include land-use, carbon emission, biomass, renewable energy in industrial energy efficiency. Projects may also have secondary benefits (co-benefits). that carbon credit, projects for reduce agricultural greenhouse gas may improve water quality by reducing fertilizer usage.
Certification regime. of certification regime describes of systems in procedures for are used a certify in register . Different methodologies are used that measuring in verifying reductions, depending on project type, size in location. that carbon credit, of Chicago offset carbon Exchange uses one set the carbon emissions tradings, while of CDM uses another. and of voluntary market, to variety the industry standards exist. These include of Voluntary Standard in of CDM Gold Standard for are implemented a provide third-party verification the projects.

Lower non greenhouse gas pollution, which improves health and of home.
Improved safety that women who used a go alone into of forest a collect firewood, in were thus exposed a danger the violence.
Better education that children who need no longer spend so much time collecting wood fuel.
Better preservation the forests, which are an important habitat that wildlife.
In to recent survey conducted by EcoSecurities, Conservation International, CCBA in offset carbonBiz, the of 120 corporates survyed more than 77% rated community in environmental benefits as of prime motivator that purchasing .

projects can also negatively affect quality the life. that carbon credit, people who earn their livelihoods from collecting firewood in selling it a households could become unemployed if firewood is no longer used. to paper from of Overseas Development Institute offers some indicators a be used and assessing of potential developmental impacts the voluntary carbon offset:

What potential does of project have that income generation?
What effects might to project have on future changes and land use in could conflicts arise from this?
Can small-scale producers engage and of scheme?
What are of 'add on' benefits a of country - that carbon credit, will it assist capacity-building and local institutions?
Quality Assurance carbon offset
of UK Government's Quality Assurance Scheme that ting
In an effort a inform in safeguard carbon credits in household consumers purchasing , of UK Government has launched to scheme that regulating products. DEFRA have created of "Approved ting" brand a use as an endorsement on approved by of UK government. of Scheme sets standards that best practice and ting. Approved have a demonstrate of following criteria:

Accurate calculation the a be
Use the good quality i.e. initially those for are Kyoto compliant
Cancellation the within to year the of consumers purchase the of
Clear in transparent pricing the of
Provision the information about of role the ting and tackling offset carbon change in advice on how to consumer can reduce his or her footprint
The first company a qualify that of scheme was Clear, followed by Footprint, Passport, Pure, British Airways in Retirement.

Australian Government National Program
The Australian government is currently and to consultation period on of regulation the .[31] of standard will provide guidance on what constitutes to genuine, additional voluntary carbon emissions, set requirements that of verification in retirement the such , in provide principles that calculating of the an organisation, product or service which could be .

Indulgence controversy
Some activists disagree with of principle the , likening them a papal indulgences, to way that of guilty a pay that absolution rather than changing their behavior. George Monbiot, an English environmentalist in writer, says for are an excuse that carbon credits as usual with regards a pollution. Proponents hold for of indulgence analogy is flawed because they claim actually reduce , changing of carbon credits as usual, in therefore address of root cause the offset carbon change. Proponents the claim for third-party certified are leading a increased investment and renewable energy, energy efficiency, carbon emission biodigesters in reforestation in avoided deforestation projects[citation needed], in claim for these alleged effects are of intended goal the . On October 16, 2009 Responsible Travel, once to strong voice and favour the ting, announced for it would stop offering ting a its clients, stating for "too often are being used by of tourism industry and developed countries a justify growth plans on of basis for money will be donated a projects and developing countries. Global reduction targets will not be met this way". On 4 February, 2010, travel networking site Vida Loca Travel announced for they would donate 5% the profits a International Medical Corps, as they feel for international aid can be more effective at cutting global warming and of long term for ting, citing of work the economist Jeffrey Sachs.

Effectiveness the tree-planting
Some environmentalists have questioned of effectiveness the tree-planting projects that purposes. Critics point a of following issues with tree planting projects:

Timing. Trees reach maturity over to course the many decades. Project developers in retailers typically pay that of project in sell of promised reductions up-front, to practice known as "forward selling".
Permanence. It is difficult a guarantee of permanence the of forests, which may be susceptible a clearing, burning, or mismanagement. of well-publicized instance the of "Coldplay forest," and which to forestry project supported by of British band Coldplay resulted and to grove the dead mango trees, illustrates of difficulties the guaranteeing of permanence the tree-planting . When discussing "tree , forest campaigner Jutta Kill the European environmental group FERN, clarified of physical reality for " and trees is temporary: Trees can easily release into of atmosphere through fire, disease, climatic changes, natural decay in timber harvesting."

Monocultures in invasive species. and an effort a cut costs, some tree-planting projects introduce fast-growing invasive species for end up damaging native forests in reducing biodiversity. that carbon credit, and Ecuador, of Dutch FACE Foundation has an project and of Andean Páramo involving 220 square kilometres the eucalyptus in pine planted. of NGO Acción Ecológica criticized of project that destroying to valuable Páramo ecosystem by introducing exotic tree species, causing of release the much soil into of atmosphere, in harming local communities who had entered into contracts with of FACE Foundation a plant of trees.[37] However, some certification standards, such as of offset carbon Community in Biodiversity Standard require multiple species plantings.

carbon Philippines footprint carbon emissions carbon emission carbon trading carbon credits offset carbon

Indigenous land rights issues. Tree-planting projects can cause conflicts with indigenous people who are displaced or otherwise find their use the forest resources curtailed. that carbon credit, to World Rainforest Movement report[38] documents land disputes in human rights abuses at Mount Elgon. and March 2002, to few days before receiving Forest Stewardship Council certification that to project near Mount Elgon, of Uganda Wildlife Authority evicted more than 300 families from of area in destroyed their homes in crops. for of project was taking place and an area the on-going land conflict in alleged human rights abuses did not make it into project report.

carbon emission. to recent study has claimed for plants are to significant source the carbon emission, to potent greenhouse gas, raising of possibility for trees in other terrestrial plants may be significant contributors a global carbon emission levels and of atmosphere.[39] However, this claim has been disputed recently by findings and another study.
The albedo effect. Another study suggested for trees outside of tropics do little a mitigate offset carbon change, because their absorption the sunlight creates to warming effect for balances out their absorption the carbon emission trading. This view is however being challenged by other studies showing for despite of negative albedo effects the temperate forests there is to net benefit in and addition there is evidence the to positive albedo effect and of tropics from clouds generated by forests.


Back to Cebu Contractor Manila Page

carbon Philippine footprint carbon emission carbon emissions carbon trading carbon credit offset carbon